Organizing Digital Files for the Family Historian or Genealogist


     One of the top complaints I hear from family researchers and genealogists has to do with organizing their digital files.

Often, part of the problem is the overwhelming volume of documents and records that we tend to collect during our research.

Then there is also the problem of not remembering what a document is once it is downloaded. File names like 'image681x689from0x57to4892x5010.jpg' certainly do not help the situation.



So how are we going to finally get our crushing mountain of unorganized document neatly organized and tucked away neatly into organized folders?

As with any job, we need to first break this down into manageable tasks.

1. First, think about how you use your database

When you go looking for a file, how do you move through your documents? Do you just click around aimlessly – ‘… it might be over here… what about here … in my downloads? … what about here…’ A smarter approach would be to search using your file manager’s search box. This is possible if you are organized and have files named with searchable and useful terms.



2. Use with broad categories

Most importantly, have a dedicated folder to house all your genealogical research. I use a top-level folder named “Genealogy.” Categories beyond this top-level should be simple and direct, yet broad enough to be effective.

“Death,” for example is a great folder name for housing all kinds of death-related material like death certificates, obituaries, death indices, and records.

“Texas Death Records,” however, probably will not be as useful. Even if you have plenty of family from the Lone Star State, you will still be guessing if an individual’s record will be in this folder or perhaps another folder. Will you need folders for every state? What about countries?



3. Find a naming scheme

This might take a couple of shots to settle into something that works for you.

File names should include enough information that you know what the file is and to whom the file mainly pertains. Remember not to use periods (.) in the file name to avoid system conflicts.

"Death Certificate - Smith, John P," is how I name most of my files. Marriage records will get both spouse's names: "Marriage License - Smith, John P & Brown, Susie M."

This keeps things simple, easy to read, and neatly organized. Records that have multiple pages, I simply add an 'a' and 'b' to the end of the file name. (Ex: "Marriage License - Smith, John P & Brown, Susie M a")

Census files get a little trickier because they contain so many people, especially when two or more related families live near one another. I've found that just including the highest-ranking person in the family, generationally speaking, in the file name works the best.

4. Stick with maiden names

Digital organization is one place that I strongly recommend against using married names for organizing. Even when a record names a female using her married name, I will still name that record as her maiden name in my database.

This is a deliberate decision on my part. I've written about using names in database organization before.

Here’s why:

When women marry, they tend to change their name. When a marriage ends, she may or may not go back to her maiden name. She may remarry and take on a third last name. Or more!

To make finding records about one person easy, I only use a person’s maiden name. This also keeps me from thinking Mary Smith, Mary Brown, and Mary Bates are all different people when I see their records.

By using maiden names, I can both easily find a person and reduce the chance of duplicates within my research.

5. Get rid of duplicates

This is going to take time but will happen naturally as you further organize your database. If you have selected a file naming scheme, this task will be made much easier as duplicate file names cannot be used.

For example, if you attempt to name two files “Marriage Announcement – Smith, John & Brown, Susie,” your file manager will alert you to the presence of a file already named this. You can check the file and see if they are, in fact, the same.

If they are not, add more information to the file name so that you can differentiate the two. For example, “Marriage Announcement – Smith, John P & Brown Susie M.”



6. Keep it up

Before you get invested in the next research session, sit down and clean out your downloads folder. Look at files and rename them before sorting them into the proper folders.

Taking care of this task refreshes your memory on who you were researching during the last few sessions and reminds you of any discoveries you might have uncovered. This habit also allows you to be better organized in the long run by keeping the contents of your unorganized download folder minimized.

Digital organization takes time to establish and will be an ongoing process after the initial setup. The reward is a somewhat neater database with information that is easy to find and use.

What are some challenges you face with digital organization? Let me know down below or over on my Facebook page.


- Patricia

How to Tackle Your Genealogy Research for Free


     Genealogy can seem like an expensive hobby due to the overwhelming marketshare the paid sites have on the industry. They hold this stuatus for good reason, don't get me wrong. I also appreciate what the paid sites do for the genealogical community as a whole and the efforts they put forth to preserve and digitize records.

For the most part these paid sites are an aggregate of publicly available records. Therefore, if you know where to find the record, you can avoid paying to access free information.

This is not always possible, and this isn't to say that paid sites do not have their place in your research. They certainly do in mine.

Explore Your Options

Sign up for a variety of ancestry and genealogical websites. They'll each have a good base of the same information, but some may have a specialty they work with that could be handy to your research. Being familiar with the various offerings will allow you to learn where to research.

Get Organized

Keep a folder in your file system that is just for genealogy research. After you have a few different record types, you should figure out a way to organize these records that is both easy to maintain and also use.

Think about how you will access this information.

Be consistant in the way you name and organize files as you go to avoid being overwhelmed with a sea of files with names you cannot make heads or tales of.

Visit Your Library

Many public libraries offer free access to paid research sites like Fold3.com or Ancestry.com. You can only access these in-library and cannot connect items to your tree. You do have full access to their database for research and download.

You can also find free classes available at both public and genealogical libraries covering a variety of topics like DNA testing, research methods, and introduction to genealogy.

Engage Your Community

Reach out to who you know first. Begin with close relatives, asking questions about their knowledge of the family.

More distant relatives can be better corresponded with via email, which keeps a handy reference for future needs.

Network in person at some of the library events or local genealogical socieities. Go online and join a few Facebook Groups that are targeted toward your research interests.

On the whole...

Genealogy certainly does not need to cost you a dime to enjoy!

Website subscriptions alone can cost hundreds of dollars per year. Memberships to local societies can cost that again.

But these same services have free offerings, as well. Taking advantage of these is the best way to get the most out of your family history journey while staying on a budget.


- Patricia

RootsTech London Recap


     The first international RootsTech was held this past weekend at the ExCel London exhibition and conference hall. For three days, family historians and genealogists from around the globe packed in to hear speakers deliver knowledge on a host of topics and network with companies and like-minded peers.

I was not able to attend but did follow along on Twitter and with the free recorded sessions that are available on the RootsTech website.

Day 1

The first day of sessions at RootsTech focused on the big picture, giving an overview of the major genealogical services that are available to us all - Ancestry, FamilySearch, MyHeritage, and Findmypast.

Gregg Richardson’s session covered FamilySearch and the ability to upload various types of family history items. Using straightforward examples and real-life situations Gregg discusses family memories; why they are indispensable to your ancestry journey, and ways these stories can connect us with the past.

Sunny Morton’s session was a vivid reminder for us all to branch out our research and not get stuck in the rut of only using one service while neglecting the others. She also tackled the question of, "Which service should I use?" in her lecture, explaining that the service providing the information you need is the correct one for you to use. In other words, branch out and get to know what is available to you. She gives a good overview of the types of records that are available at each site mentioned, as well.




Day 2

The sessions available for the second day of RootsTech London were all about British genealogy and Irish genealogy.

Researching these two can be difficult as record coverage is spotty. This infographic from Maurice Gleeson’s lecture sums up this idea in a concise visual manner:


Maurice’s session was a detailed talk you’ll want to watch over and over about the various resources available to seek out possible records for your Irish ancestors. As you can see from his infographic above, tracing Irish genealogy can be quite a task, but knowing where to look is essential in getting results.

Else Churchill’s sessions focused on 20th and late 19th century records for British genealogy. These records present their own set of challenges so, same as with Irish family history, knowing where to look is key for success.

Using some non-traditional records such as electoral rolls, phone books, and union records, Else shows us how we can still build out a life history for our 20th century British ancestors.




Day 3

DNA was the topic du jour for the final day of the RootsTech free sessions. These two sessions are essential to watch if you want to know more about DNA testing basics. Both Michelle and Debbie provide real-world examples to walk you through various DNA examples as they explain how DNA can help with your ancestry exploration.

The main idea that both of these sessions emphasize is that DNA alone is not a “magic bullet” for your research, as Debbie says. DNA is used in conjunction with other genealogical data to help further support research.




I had a fun time following along on Twitter and seeing people meet up for the first time in person. The sessions were informative and easy to follow, often with questions following the talk.

I’m looking forward to the rest of the talks becomming available next year! I’m still catching up on last year’s sessions!


- Patricia

How to Attend RootsTech London 2019 for Free


     RootsTech London 2019 will be held October 24 - October 26 at the ExCel London. Most of us genealogy nerds stateside won’t be able to attend the festivities of the three day event, but there are a couple of ways to still get in on some of the action.

Free:
RootsTech will be holding a livestream for three events per day for free. These nine sessions consist of the daily keynote speakers of the general session as well as six lectures.

The livestream begins at 2 AM PST, 5AM EST. The sessions will be available on-demand following the livestream, so don’t worry about setting that alarm clock.

I will be watching all of the lectures but am most looking forward to the two Saturday classes on DNA basics and Friday’s lecture on Irish Genealogy.

Below is a list of sessions:

  • Comparing the Genealogy Giants: Ancestry, FamilySearch, Findmypast, and MyHeritage - Sunny Morton
  • Discover Your Family at FamilySearch: Photos, Stories, and Memories - Gregg Richardson
  • A Strategic Approach to Irish Genealogy - Maurice Gleeson
  • Tracing 20th Century English Ancestors: The Joys and Challenges - Else Churchill
  • DNA is Dynamite: How to Ignite Your Ancestral Research - Michelle Leonard
  • Getting Started with DNA - Debbie Kennett

You can find a full schedule at the RootsTech schedule page.

Also, if you do happen to find yourself in London, entrance to the exhibition hall is free and they do have plenty of free events scheduled to keep attendees busy between sessions.


Paid:
For those wanting a bit more, virtual passes are available for £49, or about $61. These paid passes allow access to an additional 20 sessions for nine months following the event.

Of course, most sessions at RootsTech are available online for free after a certain period of time. The information won’t be quite as up-to-date, but it is still highly relevant.

What sessions are you most looking forward to? Any favorites from last year?


- Patricia

Should Find A Grave Implement a Waiting Period?


     There’s been some buzz again in the genealogy community regarding a waiting period for posting memorials at Find A Grave.

Specifically, I’ve seen the suggestion for implementing a waiting period for non-family members before being able to post a memorial. Other suggestions include that only immediate family would be able to create an entry during this waiting period.


Current Policy:

The current policy at Find A Grave in a very compact nutshell is as follows:
  • You can add an entry for a deceased person if there is not a current memorial for them already in the database.

  • If they were cremated or do not have a traditional burial, there are options for that during the creation of their memorial.

Why are people asking for change?

There are many stories out there from Find A Grave users that had memorials of close family or friends created by someone other than direct family or close friends, usually within a very short period following the death. This is insensitive to the grieving families and does not allow time for everyone to be notified.


So what is the intended purpose of Find A Grave, anyway?

Their goal states:

"Find a Grave’s mission is to help people from all over the world work together to find, record and present final disposition information as a virtual cemetery experience.

Basically, they function as a virtual cemetery allowing people to browse cemeteries and burials from around the world from the comfort of their pajamas and laptop.


What Find A Grave is NOT.

Find A Grave is not a memorial site. It is not a genealogy site.

I think a couple of things contribute to blurring the lines between online cemetery and gravesite index, and a memorialization site.

  1. Entries on Find A Grave are referred to as memorials. Not that I have an issue with this language being used, but I do feel this is a contributing factor to the misunderstanding of what the site is intended for.

  2. Lax active enforcement of site guidelines and general copyright.

The selected comments in the graphic above give a fair appraisal of the main ideas people are upset about:
  • Finding out their loved one died via Find A Grave
  • Someone else creating an entry for a close relative
  • Someone had to take time during their grieving process to go create a memorial for fear someone else would do it first
  • Someone else will make a memorial for your family or friend and then not turn it over to relatives
  • Lack of privacy regarding living people's names added in copied obituaries

While these seem like good arguments at face value, I cannot seem to agree with them as reasons to implement a delay in record creation. For instance, the only way you would learn a loved one or close friend died via Find A Grave would be searching the database for living people.

Having a non-relative make a profile for a person is not against community standards or policies. By using the website and agreeing to the terms of service, you agree to this understanding. Anyone can create a profile. That is the whole point of the site: an online index of cemeteries and gravesites.


What does Find A Grave say about using newspaper obituaries and other 3rd party sources?

Directly from their FAQ:

Find A Grave does not discourage the legitimate indexing of the deceased through obituaries or other 3rd party accounts. Newspapers represent a very good source of information as a public record. We ask that those who index and memorialize the deceased from newspapers and other 3rd party accounts do so with full respect of copyright, refrain from adding information about living people, and respond generously to the family of the deceased. Find A Grave takes no position on the appropriate timing of submitting such indexes.


While many of these complainants have valid issues, the banning of memorials for a timeframe after death or creation of memorials by someone other than close friends or family will not prevent these issues from happening.

Incorrect information happens not only on Find A Grave, but also on birth certificates, death certificates, cemetery records, census records, and countless other records.

Incorrect information is a regular part of genealogical research.

We cannot use the incorrect information excuse as a reason for banning entries for a set time after death. We can, however, use the proper channels to request information be corrected to fact or corrected to exclude copyright protected or private information – first through the profile manager and then via website staff if the change isn’t made. Backing documentation is always helpful during these issues.


Overall...

The discussion on a waiting period for Find A Grave isn’t a new discussion in the community. Amy Johnson Crow discussed this several years back on her blog.

I wholeheartedly agree with a suggestion she made then, which was to stop displaying the numbers.

Many users, just as Amy recounts in her contact with the Find A Grave user who created her father-in-law’s profile before his obituary was even published, are just in it for the numbers. They want to source as many profiles as possible. By hiding numbers, we can avoid this kind of competition that breeds sloppy work.

Find A Grave is a wonderful resource, and we should recognize it for what it truly is to fully embrace what it can do for our research. It is not perfect, but it is incredibly valuable and the contributions it has made to family research over the last couple decades have been priceless.

- Patricia

New Choctaw Research Resource Available!

     Recently, I came across a newly available, two-volume set of incredibly rare Choctaw family information from the mid-19th century and wanted to share my delight!


     This set was digitized and uploaded to Archive.org by Alabama Department of Archives and History, and are linked below:

     Volume 1
     Volume 2

     These two volumes were published as evidence presented with a court case, and gives an outline of various family units of Choctaw claimants in the case. While this information in itself might be difficult to pick up and use for research, there is also mention of marriages and relationships between Choctaw and settlers, which might help break through some brick walls.

     And don’t we all love that feeling?


     The ‘Search Inside’ feature on Archive.org will be your best friend when dealing with nearly 2,000 pages of information.

     Not to be ignorant of what this book details, we should also remember that this book is a detailed outline of how lands were taken without permission, and people were slaughtered without just cause.

     I link to Alabama Department of Archives and History over on my Genealogy Resources page because they have an extensive searchable digital collection available to the public.

    In addition to their online collections, they are also active on social media including Facebook, a blog, and twitter. Go check them out and keep discovering!


- Patricia

How I Get Paid Obituaries For Free (Usually)



     Have you ever gone looking for an obituary in a newspaper to get additional information on a person’s life and family only to find it locked behind a paywall?

While many newspapers are available for free on various archival sites like Internet Archive, Chronicling America, and Small Town Papers, some newspapers are only available with a paid subscription, also known as a paywall.

The most frequently used and well known paid newspaper archival site is Newspapers.com. While they are under the Ancestry corporate umbrella, they do require a separate subscription.

I certainly understand how frustrating this roadblock can be during the research process. Especially when you are able to see a preview of the obituary and know it has something you are looking for.

Recently, this was the exact situation I found myself in.

So today, I want to share with you my research path for locating and obtaining these obituaries for free.

Most of the time.

This is not guaranteed to work, and it will vary from situation to situation, but below I have outlined a rather detailed account, using a real-life situation I encountered, of my typical research path to obtain these obituaries for free.


Backstory:
     While on a recent family vacation to South Dakota, we stopped in at the Nemo Cemetery so I could take pictures and wander around. The grave covering for one individual, Tracey Schmitz, caught my eye as it had a beautiful poem inscribed on the top of it.

I noticed that her father was buried next to her and photographed both. I was able to upload pictures of their headstones to FindAGrave.

Recently, I’ve also been doing some cemetery categorization work over at WikiTree and decided to add the cemetery to the site for practice. I also wanted to add their profiles to the site to help see how it all fits together, so I went in search of information to aid in building a short biography for these individuals.



Research Path:
     Once I am ready to research, I begin with what I know. I have a name, Tracey D Schmitz, and dates of birth and death: October 26, 1956 – June 09, 1984. I also knew she was buried in Nemo Cemetery in Nemo, South Dakota.

First, I do a cursory internet search on Google just to see what is available. Sometimes you get lucky and can easily find an obituary. However, being that this person passed away several decades ago, the likelihood of finding it online so easily was slim.

With no results after quickly scanning the first handful of internet search results, I then move on to more specialized sites I can search for free: FindAGrave, FamilySearch, and Ancestry.

Looking at her Find A Grave, there is a reference to the obituary, “from the Index to Obits in the Rapid City Journal, obit is in the June 11 paper, no place of death given,” but no further information.


From here, I went to browse the index at Chronicling America to see if they have an archive of Rapid City Journal available online. They do not.

Next, I went to Ancestry to see if a user might have uploaded a copy of the obituary. On Ancestry, you are usually able to search for free, with some information in the results removed, but are rarely ever able to view a search result without having an active paid subscription to Ancestry. To get around this, I am able to access Ancestry for free from my library card. Many libraries offer free Ancestry access. I am not able to save anything to my personal tree, but I can still download images of census records or family photos and I can view other family trees.

In the Ancestry search, I found a link to the Rapid City Genealogy Society that does look-ups in the Rapid City Journal, and even had the obituary I needed, but asks or a donation in return. I’m not opposed to this, I’m just on a budget and a few dollars here and there will quickly add up in the long run.

So far I've exhausted several of my go-to resources and I know I will not be able to obtain this obituary without forking over money. At this point, I will turn to others for community help. There are a few places I do this at:
r/Genealogy will post a weekly Paid Record Look Up Requests Thread on Sundays where users can ask other users to lookup something from a paywall site. However, because I was doing this research on a Thursday, there was a greater likelihood of my request not being fulfilled due to lack of activity in the thread.

I decide Facebook Groups will probably be my best bet for this step and head over to ask in a couple different groups. The first I ask in is the Free Obituary Look-Ups group. They are organized by state and are usually fairly responsive, but require you to know exactly what you are looking for before you ask. The second group I go to for assistance is South Dakota Genealogy Network. Here I ask if someone with a paid account can do a lookup for me and also post the information.

Now I wait.

This may take a few days sometimes, but it usually gets done sooner rather than later. Today I was lucky and my request was answered within ten minutes of posting to the Facebook group.

This research took me about 45 minutes to complete, including interruptions from a toddler. The great thing that I love about this research path is that it showcases so many different resources.



     Genealogy is filled with so many great resources but finding and utilizing them is another challenge all itself. My top three tips for keeping resources organized are:

  1. Start by Organizing
  2. Keep Research Records
  3. Use Bookmarks

I'll cover these tips more in depth at a later date and give examples of how I do each step.

What are your favorite research resources?

How many resources do you use while researching?

It may seem like just a couple were used after you've completed the research, but when you look back at your research path it is often far greater than expected. This research outlined above, for instance, may have used Facebook to ask someone to use their Newspapers account, we still accessed Google, FindAGrave, Newspapers, Chronicling America, Ancestry, the Rapid City Genealogy Society, Reddit, and Facebook.

To help with organizing resources, I’ve created a page here to list these resource sites that I find, both big and small, and organized them roughly by state.

I created this resource because I had a huge bookmark folder of research resources that I wanted to easily share with others. Go check it out and let me know what I’m missing!


- Patricia

52 Ancestors Challenge Week 21

     For several years fellow blogger Amy Johnson Crow has been running a genealogy challenge that has seen increased popularity in the last couple years. Over on WikiTree, they have decided to pick up this challenge and issue a weekly open-ended prompt on the message boards. Each prompt is designed for members to discuss and respond with an ancestor or story that fits with that week’s prompt. In addition to answering over on WikiTree's G2G forum, I'll also be answering here in a more complete form.
     This week’s theme is a perfect fit for the recent research I’ve been doing on my second great uncle, Lyman Thurl Spradlin.

The only son of James David Spradlin and Georgia Etta Ross, Lyman departed Oran, Missouri on May 10, 1918 for training in Waco, Texas. After several weeks of training, Lyman departed from Hoboken, New Jersey on August 03, 1918 headed for the French battlefields. Injured by shrapnel on September 27, he died six days later on October 03, 1918.


His initial burial was in France and the American Red Cross sent a sympathy card to the family with a photo of his grave enclosed. After the end of the war, many of the fallen soldiers were returned home and Lyman was included in this. Departing Antwerp, Belgium June 19 and arriving in Hoboken, New Jersey on July 02, Lyman was finally welcomed home in Oran, Missouri on Saturday, August 06, 1921.


His funeral was the next day at his family home attended by the Oran National Guard, his family, and the community. Burial followed in Friends Hill Cemetery in Oran, Missouri.

Since researching him, I’ve often felt as if he was just caught up in the war, not really meaning to go or thinking they’d need him as he was married and supported his family. His death saddens me and researching the Meuse-Argonne Offensive and the Lost Battalion, occurring just days after his death, has been a stark reminder of the terrors of war.


- Patricia

52 Ancestors Challenge Week 20

     For several years fellow blogger Amy Johnson Crow has been running a genealogy challenge that has seen increased popularity in the last couple years. Over on WikiTree, they have decided to pick up this challenge and issue a weekly open-ended prompt on the message boards. Each prompt is designed for members to discuss and respond with an ancestor or story that fits with that week’s prompt. In addition to answering over on WikiTree's G2G forum, I'll also be answering here in a more complete form.
     The topic of “Nature” for this week’s challenge is keeping with the springtime theme from last week. I nearly had a tie for this week’s spotlight but wanted to bring back a showcase on my father. When the challenge began, I was certain I would end up repeating more ancestors and I only have one repeat nearly halfway through.

Both my father and my maternal grandmother were big influences on my love of gardening. My grandmother was known for her beautifully manicured flower beds, tea areas, and lawn. Nearly all her free time was spent on these beautiful flower beds and tea areas.

My father, on the other hand, was more of a straightforward gardener. I can recall rows of corn, carrots, green beans, peppers, and tomatoes. We also had peach and plum trees scattered around the yard and were blessed to have an old Texas pecan tree, as well. Dad would go all out on his roses, though. That was his one ornamental plant he really enjoyed and would wait all year getting ready for a new addition the following year.

Now that I’ve established a little family of my own, we’ve taken out a community garden plot and have made a point to continue this tradition. I definitely take more after my father in gardening styles with lots of veggies planted and plenty of help from little hands. We have a few flowers on the back porch, but most of our effort goes into productive gardening that will help supplement our veggie intake.


- Patricia

52 Ancestors Challenge Week 19

     For several years fellow blogger Amy Johnson Crow has been running a genealogy challenge that has seen increased popularity in the last couple years. Over on WikiTree, they have decided to pick up this challenge and issue a weekly open-ended prompt on the message boards. Each prompt is designed for members to discuss and respond with an ancestor or story that fits with that week’s prompt. In addition to answering over on WikiTree's G2G forum, I'll also be answering here in a more complete form.
     For week 19 we have an aptly named springtime theme of "Nurture".

I've been in the garden full-time this past week and it has been nice to see the rewards already showing from that. This week's prompt is a perfect reflection of this time of year and the prime candidate popped into mind.


Here, you can see Charles Wajdak on the right posing in front of his home for best lawn award. In addition to this gem of American life, I've found numerous articles about him visiting ailing family, raising his children, and various exploits from his fishing days along the Texas coast.

Over the last week, I had a trial to Newspapers.com and took advantage of it by searching out unique family names. Charles Wajdak was an easy target for his unique last name, and I was happy to find so many articles about him and his family.

I’m not big on subscription services, especially when most of the information they have can be found for free with a bit of legwork. However, the free trial periods to websites are a great way to take advantage of their convenience without getting committed to a high-priced service that is generally not worth the investment.

What are some of the things you've discovered in old newspapers about your family?


- Patricia

When Records Are Not Accurate


     In our modern, electronic world we have come to rely on vital records like birth and death certificates to be accurate, infallible sources of information. We use these documents to identify ourselves, gain employment, attend school, travel, and so much more. How could these goverment documents have incorrect information entered onto them?

This is not a conspiracty theory, but rather a logical fallacy. We seem to have this idea that due of the importance of the document, we hold the document in higher regard in our research than other first-hand sources.

We depend upon these accurate vital records to assist in completing our genealogical research. But let’s face it: Records are not always accurate.

I have two examples to share that demonstrate this point. One is straight forward while the other is a bit complicated.

Grab a tasty beverage and settle in while we examine these not-so-accurate records.



Example 1:



First, we have my father’s death certificate.

Several errors are here including marital status and surviving spouse, mother’s name prior to first marriage, and the informant’s name and relationship to deceased.

Because I am more familiar with the situation, I can easily spot these errors, but someone else might not realize them and use this document as a basis for research causing them to miss items or waste time running down leads that simply do not exist.

  • His mother’s name is not Betty Parker. It is Harper Edwards. Nowhere close.
  • He was not married at the time of his death.
  • The spouse listed as surviving was divorced from him nearly twelve years prior. Again, way off.



Example 2:

My second example is the 1850 United States Federal Census for Russell Gray, Joyce Ferguson, and their children.

One of the issues with this record is that it is split over two pages – father, mother, and one child are on the first page, with three children on the next page. This has caused the family to be indexed as two separate families in some databases.


I had initially come across this record when searching for the family but passed on it because I didn’t realize it continued the next page and therefore did not see the remaining children.

The youngest child of Russell and Joyce is Washington, listed as 1. Other babies in the surrounding homes have their ages listed in months if they are under 1, so this leads me to believe that Washington was born in 1849.

His death certificate, however, lists his date of birth as 1851.


Again, this is an example of primary sources being incorrect. This isn’t to discredit them, however, but to call to the forefront the importance of complete research.



     These two cases are typical of the situations I've encountered most frequently in my research.

I do not think I have found one resource that has proven to be accurate 100% of the time. Everything from birth records, census, death records, marriage records, divorce, and even tombstones can be wrong. This has led me to not believe anything I see until I have other facts to further prove it.

What are some of the baffling encounters you've had with records? Have you ever had to disprove a record that others assumed was correct or disproved a record you previously assumed was correct?


- Patricia

52 Ancestors Challenge Week 11

     For several years fellow blogger Amy Johnson Crow has been running a genealogy challenge that has seen increased popularity in the last couple years. Over on WikiTree, they have decided to pick up this challenge and issue a weekly open-ended prompt on the message boards. Each prompt is designed for members to discuss and respond with an ancestor or story that fits with that week’s prompt. In addition to answering over on WikiTree's G2G forum, I'll also be answering here in a more complete form.
     I wanted to have a little fun with this week’s challenge topic of “Large Family” and put the spotlight on myself for this one.

I come from a blended family where both my parents had children from previous marriages before they were together. My father had four children and my mother had one, and then had four children together.

After their separation, they each married people that had children, giving me a total of seven new stepsiblings.

For those keeping track at home, that would be 16 siblings. The oldest out of the group was born in 1948 and the youngest was born in 1987. While I view this as one large family, it is incredibly segmented with many of my siblings not knowing anything about one another’s existence. It is an odd situation, but one I find quite amusing.


- Patricia

52 Ancestors Challenge Week 6

     For several years fellow blogger Amy Johnson Crow has been running a genealogy challenge that has seen increased popularity in the last couple years. Over on WikiTree, they have decided to pick up this challenge and issue a weekly open-ended prompt on the message boards. Each prompt is designed for members to discuss and respond with an ancestor or story that fits with that week’s prompt. In addition to answering over on WikiTree's G2G forum, I'll also be answering here in a more complete form.
     "Surprise" is the topic for the sixth week of this challenge. I was a little late for this challenge but was happy to get back into the swing of things.
     One of the bigger surprises for me when I was a novice genealogist was the lack of records from the early 19th century in much of North America. I had imagined that the large religious drive that prompted much of the early settlement would translate into well-kept records.
     In addition to the religious undertone of early American life, I would have assumed that time would also help establishe decent records. With the colonization of the American continent beginning in the 17th century, I would have assumed better records would be available for residents nearly two centuries later. While there are intermittent church and town records during this time, they are hardly consistent and vary widely on what and who was recorded.
     I feel that I can often find better records from the same time in Europe, and better records begin appearing again around 1870 to 1880 in the United States. This has created kind of a donut hole in records where I can find information about a grandparent and grandchild, but little information on the middle generation parent. I feel like this is the culprit for many of my brick walls.
     A smaller surprise that I have encountered is the amount of high inter-marrying in early American towns and villages. I’ve experienced two or three families marrying at various points in time. Most of the time I am sure they knew of the closeness of the families, but other times, I’m not so sure. While this doesn’t have a huge impact on my research, it does create some very complicated – and difficult to trace – family lines, often with naming conventions that even further confuse.
- Patricia

52 Ancestors Challenge Week 5

     For several years fellow blogger Amy Johnson Crow has been running a genealogy challenge that has seen increased popularity in the last couple years. Over on WikiTree, they have decided to pick up this challenge and issue a weekly open-ended prompt on the message boards. Each prompt is designed for members to discuss and respond with an ancestor or story that fits with that week’s prompt. In addition to answering over on WikiTree's G2G forum, I'll also be answering here in a more complete form.
     This weeks' theme is "At the Library".
     This one was a more difficult topic to tackle because I could not recall a good relative for the subject. My initial train of thought went towards ancestors who may have been librarians or architects that may have built a library. Perhaps a person who attended a dedication ceremony or a prolific library volunteer.
     After a day of waffling back and forth on the topic, I settled with Marcius Denison Raymond, the author of “Gray Genealogy,” the 1887 genealogical record of the Gray family in early America. This book, which I’ve written about way back when, was one of the first jumping off points I had in genealogy. It was really like opening the door to Narnia for my research potential.
     In contrast to many other anthologies that you find in the genealogical world, Raymond’s book does not carry a numbering system that you frequently find in other works. While this may seem complicated, Raymond is incredibly articulate on who these individuals are and from whom they are descended. He has included copies of historic family letters as well as contemporary letters from his correspondence compiling the book.
     Beyond this work, Raymond was the author of several other genealogical books, papers, and lectures both on the Gray family as well as his Raymond line.
     Despite this seemingly full-time work load, Raymond was employed as the editor and publisher of two newspapers in upstate New York.
     More information about Marcius D Raymond can be found on his Wikipedia or over on his WikiTree.
- Patricia

52 Ancestors Challenge Week 4

     For several years fellow blogger Amy Johnson Crow has been running a genealogy challenge that has seen increased popularity in the last couple years. Over on WikiTree, they have decided to pick up this challenge and issue a weekly open-ended prompt on the message boards. Each prompt is designed for members to discuss and respond with an ancestor or story that fits with that week’s prompt. In addition to answering over on WikiTree's G2G forum, I'll also be answering here in a more complete form.
     This weeks’ theme is "I'd like to meet".
     My beautiful grandmother, Harper Edwards, is the person I would most like to meet out of my ancestors.

     While she died several decades before I was born, Harper was probably the earliest figure who sparked my interest in my family’s history. Known in our family simply as “Ma Gray,” when my father passed away, I realized I’d never learned what her true name was and there was almost no one available I could ask about these things.
     After my father’s death, I began searching for who exactly this mystery woman was that my father spoke of so highly.
     Born in northeast Texas in 1894, Harper was the 8th of 11 children. Her family moved from the Clarksville area to McCulloch County, Texas where she married my grandfather, Washington Gray. Together they would have ten children over the next 24 years.
     For most of her life, Harper was a dutiful wife and mother. After her husband’s untimely death in 1939, Harper was left to raise their younger children as a single mother. She entered the workforce and eventually moved to El Paso around 1955 where she worked as a nurse’s aide until her death in 1963.
- Patricia

52 Ancestors Challenge Week 3

     For several years fellow blogger Amy Johnson Crow has been running a genealogy challenge that has seen increased popularity in the last couple years. Over on WikiTree, they have decided to pick up this challenge and issue a weekly open-ended prompt on the message boards. Each prompt is designed for members to discuss and respond with an ancestor or story that fits with that week’s prompt. In addition to answering over on WikiTree's G2G forum, I'll also be answering here in a more complete form.
     This is the third week of the challenge, but the first week that I am joining in on the action. I am excited to see where exactly this challenge will end up taking me in my tree and research.

     This weeks’ theme is "Unusual Name".

     Names tend to go in and out of fashion, albeit slower than clothing or other trends. Looking back through my tree there are some unusual names such as Earskin, Methodite, and Vitallis. However, the name that I chose for this week’s challenge was Blackleach Burrit.

     Our relation is null, however, his daughter Diantha married my first cousin five times removed in May of 1793 if that is any consolation.



     I chose Blackleach Burrit out of all the other names I had to choose from because I feel his name is Puritanical in nature, fitting in with his overall personality and character.

     After graduating from Yale College in 1765, he studied in Connecticut for three years to become a preacher under Rev. Jebidiah Mills before being licensed for the Congregational Church in February of 1768. His growing family soon moved to New York in the early 1770s and he became notable for his extemporaneous preaching during the Great Awakening.

     In addition to being an evangelical preacher, Blackleach Burrit was also an early American Revolutionary. By 1779, Blackleach’s work had brought him back to the Congregational Church in Greenwich, Connecticut. From this pulpit, he would take the cause of American support. Angering the British with his political stance, this would lead to his arrest in June of 1779 and subsequent imprisonment of more than a year at the Sugar House Prisons of New York City.

     By October of 1780, Blackleach is recorded as preaching once more in New York. The next decade sees the family continue to move around New York and Connecticut following the work of Blackleach. Blackleach’s wife dies in 1786 and he remarries in about 1790. His last appointment was to the Congregational Society of Winhall, Vermont beginning in January of 1793. During the early autumn of 1794, he passed away.

     Blackleach was prolific in both preaching and family, the father of 14 children total – 12 with his first wife, Martha Welles, and two with his second wife, Deborah Wells.


- Patricia